Skip to main content

BlogPost #7


I think I’m always going to find it incredibly interesting how the state standards outline the gradual progression of learning material for students. On that note I also think it’s interesting how the NES text does basically the opposite. It is your job as the educator to take what read/learn for general application and fine tune it for your own classroom and students. When I think about it more that definitely makes sense but as someone who is new to the whole teaching thing it seems rather terrifying to be honest. While the NES text is less specific than the CCSS I appreciate accessibility of the language used and how easy it is to read. Not that the CCSS aren’t also easy to read but the NES texts highlight actual ways to be a better educator rather than what needs to happen for your students. Even though we are studying to become English educators it is nice to be able to read the text and not have to try and reword for my own better understanding I know what is being said right away. Another counterpoint (I guess I’m going everywhere today) while I’m a big fan of the NES texts and its accessibility to almost all who come across it – the text also covers so much and sometimes is repetitive that I believe it can be confusing or just slightly obnoxious to pick and choose what is important. All in all, and probably obvious to others is that the best way to use both the NES text and the CCSS is in collaboration with one another and other educators. I am also curious if there would be a good way to let students in on the NES text for definitions or just when they ask, “why do we have to learn this?” It seems like it could be an easy way to be transparent with your students while keeping their interest instead of giving a generic response of “because I’m the teacher and I said so” or something of the sort. Maybe I’m stretching it kind of far but I just think that would be an interesting approach to the learning material we as educators are given.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BlogPost #4

After reading the standards for speaking and listen in ELA for grades 5-12 it is easier to see the natural progression as time moves forward of what is expected of students. The standards add one or two things every year to really hone in on specific skills that are needed in life. It is also nice to see the big differences that very from the earlier years to junior and senior and how you start with this one skill and through the years it becomes one skill but will multiple facets that showcase how students become better learners and can showcase this. This for me eases my mind for standardized testing – I guess before I let myself be overwhelmed with the idea of having to teach completely new ideas but after reading the standards knowing it is really just adding to the base makes incorporating the standards and texts to classroom easier-ish. In the NES text, I appreciate all the different methods that are shown to meet the standards described in the speaking and listen common core s...

BlogPost #2

The cultural significance differences that the Native English Speaker Teachers are making in Japan is something that got me quite intrigued with this article. I am curious if the invitation from the Japanese government for people to immigrate to Japan to combat their declining population issue is why the culture swap is happening. Maybe this is a bias opinion and I am not open enough to change when it is presented in front of me here in the USA – however, it seems as if the Native English Speaker Teachers are making cultural enough impacts on the university students in Japan while immigrant cultural impacts are not happening nearly as rapidly or at all in the western world.  I didn't really quite understand all the numbers meanings and statistical analysis graphs shown throughout the article, but that's mainly because I don't understand most math of any sorts. I would be curious to a follow up article in a few more years to see the cultural significance differences to s...

Reading Literature Handout

Reading Literature Handout Description: -           Part One: This section is a small collection of notes, interviews, and recordings from teachers who have implemented multicultural texts in their classrooms and their students who received these lessons. The stories detail the highs and lows of multicultural classrooms actually reading multicultural texts. Two of the stories I really gravitated towards and will be focusing on are Students Resistance to Engagement and No Imagined Peaceful Place. In the chapter Students Resistance to Engagement the editors and teacher discuss the hardships of that are brought on by students who can’t understand why there is a need to read the texts. Explicitly talking of “Backlash to Challenges of White Privilege” and “Denial of Racial Difference” where it is discussed that some students will struggle with accepting that their own perspective and experiences vary drastically from that of their peers. It ...