I think I’m always going to find it incredibly interesting how
the state standards outline the gradual progression of learning material for students.
On that note I also think it’s interesting how the NES text does basically the
opposite. It is your job as the educator to take what read/learn for general application
and fine tune it for your own classroom and students. When I think about it more
that definitely makes sense but as someone who is new to the whole teaching
thing it seems rather terrifying to be honest. While the NES text is less
specific than the CCSS I appreciate accessibility of the language used and how
easy it is to read. Not that the CCSS aren’t also easy to read but the NES
texts highlight actual ways to be a better educator rather than what needs to
happen for your students. Even though we are studying to become English educators
it is nice to be able to read the text and not have to try and reword for my
own better understanding I know what is being said right away. Another counterpoint
(I guess I’m going everywhere today) while I’m a big fan of the NES texts and
its accessibility to almost all who come across it – the text also covers so
much and sometimes is repetitive that I believe it can be confusing or just slightly
obnoxious to pick and choose what is important. All in all, and probably obvious
to others is that the best way to use both the NES text and the CCSS is in collaboration
with one another and other educators. I am also curious if there would be a good
way to let students in on the NES text for definitions or just when they ask, “why
do we have to learn this?” It seems like it could be an easy way to be transparent
with your students while keeping their interest instead of giving a generic response
of “because I’m the teacher and I said so” or something of the sort. Maybe I’m
stretching it kind of far but I just think that would be an interesting approach
to the learning material we as educators are given.
After reading the standards for speaking and listen in ELA for grades 5-12 it is easier to see the natural progression as time moves forward of what is expected of students. The standards add one or two things every year to really hone in on specific skills that are needed in life. It is also nice to see the big differences that very from the earlier years to junior and senior and how you start with this one skill and through the years it becomes one skill but will multiple facets that showcase how students become better learners and can showcase this. This for me eases my mind for standardized testing – I guess before I let myself be overwhelmed with the idea of having to teach completely new ideas but after reading the standards knowing it is really just adding to the base makes incorporating the standards and texts to classroom easier-ish. In the NES text, I appreciate all the different methods that are shown to meet the standards described in the speaking and listen common core s...
Comments
Post a Comment