I thoroughly enjoyed this article
on different ways to lead a discussion in your classroom because it introduced
me to some discussion tactics that I had not heard of before and others that I
wouldn’t of thought to implement in a secondary classroom. Setting ground rules
within the discussion group is something that changes what I know about setting
ground rules and uses it to the advantage of both teacher and student. The
teacher still gets to implement rules they wish students to follow but students
will also get the opportunity to identify rules in which they would like they
have just between group. As this could and most likely would differ from
discussion group to discussion group the outcome of the discussion will not
only be differed because of the different minds and ideas from students but
also because they have their own set of rules to be follow. Potentially even
allowing varied ideas from the same groups if you switched rules from group to
group throughout the discussion period.
I like the introduction to me of
the hatful of quotes discussion idea. This isn’t something I’ve thought but I
prefer how it creates an environment or requirement from students to use their
voice during class but does so in a gentle way of asking for volunteers at
first both slowly growing to those who might have not talked at all given the
opportunity. As stated in the text it will also give those students who are
less than hyped about talking more time to think and then they can even pull
off ideas from their classmates and agree or disagree or build their own
argument as more and more people share.
When I first read the heading
“Rotating Stations” I thought that meant that students would rotate between
groups not that student groups would rotate around different dialogue stations
(my mind works in mysterious ways apparently).
While I like the texts definition of a rotating station I still can’t
help but let my mind wonder what the outcomes would be if you broke students
into small discussion groups for a short period of time and then had two of the
students then rotate on and so forth for a while how many ideas would cross
paths. Is this a crazy idea to ask of students to be able to keep their calm
while shuffling and intermediately being asked to discuss their academic topic
or is a good way to truly have a whole class discussion while maintaining the
small discussion group feel so that students who would rather not talk in front
of the entire class still have a good opportunity to share with most of their
fellow classmates.
Comments
Post a Comment